PBA Controversy: Ginebra VS San Miguel game was FIXED?

PBA is about to face another problem and it could be as big as the current pandemic if they do not treat it the right way.

According to the post, Daniel de Guzman of San Miguel Beermen, made a wrong tip about the game between San Miguel and Ginebra.

It is not clear though if the wrong tip was all about the result or only about the spread. If it is about the result, then Ginebra should have won the game. 

Now, the social media posts were very detailed about what happened. It is a kind of post that it is hard to fabricate.

Although, it can still be done if the one that created it is really familiar with the game-fixing that is happening in the game.

Although, if we think about it, the game betting that was discussed in the post was the illegal one. If that is the case, it is hard to believe the long-term players there to just be revealing everything to the public.

That is not the way they operate.

So, the people who are accusing De Guzman could be those who are not really familiar with the SOPs inside game-betting.

That reality is a double-edged sword. The accusers may have just made a very big bad move and there is a chance that they are now at risk for bringing it out to the public.

How much hate is needed for a person to risk that much? 

What do you think, do you think the accusation against De Guzman is true?